Monday, July 16, 2007

Migraine: Association with socioeconomic status


Migraine in adolescents
Association with socioeconomic status and family history

M. E. Bigal, MD, PhD, R. B. Lipton, MD, P. Winner, DO, M. L. Reed, PhD, S. Diamond, MD, W. F. Stewart, PhD On behalf of the AMPP advisory group*

From the Departments of Neurology (M.E.B., R.B.L.) and Epidemiology and Population Health (R.B.L.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; The Montefiore Headache Center (M.E.B., R.B.L.), Bronx, NY; The New England Center for Headache (M.E.B.), Stamford, CT; The Palm Beach Headache Center (P.W.), Palm Beach, FL; Vedanta Research (M.L.R.), Chapel Hill, NC; The Diamond Headache Center (S.D.), Chicago, IL; and The Center for Health Research and Rural Advocacy (W.F.S.), Danville, PA.


Objective: The influence of socioeconomic status on the prevalence of migraine is unknown in adolescents. Accordingly, we investigated the prevalence of migraine in a large sample of adolescents by sociodemographic features.

Methods: A validated headache questionnaire was mailed to 120,000 households representative of the US population. All individuals in the household were interviewed (probands and their parents). We calculated sex-specific prevalence estimates of migraine in adolescents derived by age, race, urban vs rural residence, household income, region of the country, and parental status of migraine, using log-linear models.

Results: A total of 32,015 adolescents were identified. Surveys were returned by 18,714 of them (58.4% response rate).The 1-year prevalence of migraine was 6.3% (5.0% in boys and 7.7% in girls). The prevalence was higher in girls than in boys older than 12 and in whites than African Americans. In families with an annual income lower than $22,500, the adjusted prevalence of migraine in adolescents without a parental history of migraine was 4.4%; in families earning $90,000 or more, it was 2.9% (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.63). In adolescents with a parental history of migraine, the prevalence in the lower vs the higher income group was 8.6% vs 8.4% (OR = 0.97, 0.81 to 1.15).

Conclusions: In adolescents with family history of migraine, household income does not have a significant effect, probably because of the higher biologic predisposition. In those without a strong predisposition, household income is associated with prevalence. This suggests social causation rather than social selection, highlighting the need for exploration of environmental risk factors related to low income and migraine and the search for specific comorbidities and stressors in this group.

NEUROLOGY 2007;69:16-25
© 2007 American Academy of Neurology

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Urteter nuytre: http://dietami.001webs.com

Anonymous said...

This one is an inspiration personally to uncover out way more related to this subject. I must confess your information prolonged my sentiments in addition to I'm going to proper now take your feed to stay updated on every coming weblog posts you might probably create. You might be worthy of thanks for a job perfectly completed! charles david handbag| футболки с надписью тектоник| the handbags and the gladbags| "Say," cries Jack, "no sooner did you clap eyes on her than it's 'My
http://s1.shard.jp/campming/update-zack-christian-concentration-camp.html Click Here

Anonymous said...

This one is an inspiration personally to uncover out way more associated to this subject. I have to confess your knowledge prolonged my sentiments in addition to I am going to right now take your feed to remain updated on each coming blog posts you might possibly create. You're worthy of thanks for a job perfectly finished! coach handbag 4015| handbag vinyl| как появилась фамилия закаляев| passed out of him
http://s1.shard.jp/campmau/police-department-camps-alexanderia.html Click Here